Celebrating May Day: Changing Work and Changing Workers

International Labour Day is celebrated on 1st May every year, it also is known as International Worker’s Day.

Urban Indians are increasingly becoming distanced from the workers in their cities. In spite of being a public holiday in numerous states, we usually remain oblivious to the many gatherings and celebrations around us celebrating the international workers day on May 1.  Depending upon your location – both geographical and in ‘class’ hierarchy – you will know May-day in its numerous synonyms.

Understanding the History behind Labour Day

In Hindi, it is called Shramik Diwas or Mazdoor Diwas. In Marathi, it is called Kamgar Din, Uzhaipalar Dhinam in Tamil and Thozilaali Dinam in Malayalam. Each transformed and contextualized within the local vocabulary and adopted as part of their local celebrations and other struggles. It is not a matter of coincidence that Maharashtra Diwas is celebrated on 1st May – as it a result of a movement that was led by the peasants and workers of erstwhile Bombay State for the statehood of Maharashtra, and Mumbai (then Bombay) to remain as its capital. Workers marches and union celebrations were frequent in our streets, and some of that did percolate into the mainstream in the form of celebrations in our schools and workplaces, a practice that is weaning quickly. May day in the present neo-liberal times is increasingly restricted to mostly the formal working classes and unions, with a vast majority indifferent to the workers in the cities and their concerns.

The Changing Dimensions

The gradual shrinking of Labour Day from public memory is an indication of our days to come. The conventional worker organizations have hastily declined in the urban landscape and have been rapidly replaced by swanky red colored Swiggy and Zomato delivery boy uniforms. The formalized spaces of worker collectives so common to our cities have been exchanged gradually, with hordes of construction workers standing in hot summer mornings of our street corners; waiting to be picked up for a day’s labor. Mushrooming of street vendors who sell the tastiest snacks and tea for the lowest prices is also a perverse sign that most are unable to find gainful employment, and others who consume this, are unable to afford anything more. Or the app-based taxi drivers, who are classified ironically as ‘entrepreneurs’ have to self-exploit themselves with a vast majority living and sleeping in the cabs to meet their exorbitant debts cycles.

Closer to us and in our homes, the domestic workers – or maids and helpers as we call them to deny their worker identity and rights, toil long hours for a wage far below a living wage. This visible difference of the new workers in the urban is unlike our past visualizations are not the unionized, formal – blue-collar, factory going male workers. In the present, it is markedly dissimilar as the informal, unorganized, insecure workforce that is omnipresent in complex urban systems yet invisible. Most of them work in deplorable – exploitative conditions far away from any social securities and most without any labor protections. And some of them are unconscious about perpetuating the self-exploiting systems.

This invisibilization of workers has resulted in the increasing apathy of the state and the public in general, leading to the normalization of the day to day violations in worker livelihoods that are now taken for granted. Labour – or ‘labor class’ as is referred to in common parlance has in itself has become a derogatory term, suggesting the socio-political divide between workers and their struggles from the so-called middle classes.  Gone are the days, where our heroes were Vijay, the dock-worker of Deewaar or Iqbal of Coolie – who captured the imagination of the masses and voiced the dissent of the public against the state and regressive social forces.

The receding of worker concerns in the public sphere is also concomitant to the stagnation of the worker’s movement. The struggles have been limited, in scope, kind and size, constrictive to living wages, rights and entitlements with social securities – rhetoric, which the neo-liberal state has been convenient to accede partially, sidestep and ignore usually. Presently, the dismantled welfare state is hell-bent on focusing on improving the ease of doing business more than altering the lives of millions of workers. Labour laws, hopeful as they are for the formal sector, address only a minuscule of the vastly informal sector workforce we have and are ironically being demolished under the guise of offering expansive provisions of social security and rights to all workers. It is imperative now to alter our style and means to challenge the state and win over people, and their minds. What the Farmers Long March did to catapult into the mainstream the deprivations of farmers and Aamchi Best did to build a rainbow coalition to fight for Mumbai’s public transportation along with best workers needs to done more often. And in different locations, with newer constituencies and on issues concerning not just workers, but a vast majority that lives in precarious conditions in our cities, thereby building new solidarities across class lines.  So, while Bollywood’s Vijay and Iqbal are now replaced by Rahul and Kabir who never go to work themselves or notice the informal workers, this May Day, it should be our collective resolve to stand with the new workers and make visible their daily struggles and toil to keep our cities running. While we do that, perhaps this is also an opportune time to bring together divergent struggles of caste, gender, and identity to lend strength to the Workers Movement. Also laying open the possibilities for a new alternative imagination to the neoliberal – capital led urbanization and development of our cities, which can only come from the workers and toilers.